<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In this zero-sum game, we&#8217;re all losers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/01/18/in-this-zero-sum-game-were-all-losers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/01/18/in-this-zero-sum-game-were-all-losers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:51:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imp</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/01/18/in-this-zero-sum-game-were-all-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Imp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/01/18/in-this-zero-sum-game-were-all-losers/#comment-675</guid>
		<description>In a zero-sum game, for one person to win another must lose, so one strategy is to try to maximize the harm you do to your opponent.

So the part that scares me about the statement that “Privacy and security are a zero-sum game” is not that it implies that to get better security people must give up some of their privacy. What really scares me is that this shows that key people in the US Government believe that anything which harms privacy will, as a side effect, improve security. Sadly, I think this explains a lot of the actions by the US Department of Homeland Security – when they can’t think of anything to do to improve security they decide to harm privacy instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a zero-sum game, for one person to win another must lose, so one strategy is to try to maximize the harm you do to your opponent.</p>
<p>So the part that scares me about the statement that “Privacy and security are a zero-sum game” is not that it implies that to get better security people must give up some of their privacy. What really scares me is that this shows that key people in the US Government believe that anything which harms privacy will, as a side effect, improve security. Sadly, I think this explains a lot of the actions by the US Department of Homeland Security – when they can’t think of anything to do to improve security they decide to harm privacy instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThisCanadian</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/01/18/in-this-zero-sum-game-were-all-losers/comment-page-1/#comment-635</link>
		<dc:creator>ThisCanadian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 04:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/01/18/in-this-zero-sum-game-were-all-losers/#comment-635</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;going on up to the &#039;Server in the Sky&#039;&quot; - Canada&#039;s hopes for democracy?...&lt;/strong&gt;

for a few hours at least, Canada&#039;s government showed a spine... ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;going on up to the &#8216;Server in the Sky&#8217;&#8221; &#8211; Canada&#8217;s hopes for democracy?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>for a few hours at least, Canada&#8217;s government showed a spine&#8230; &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

