<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lolcatz support net neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:45:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks about Lolcatz</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1960</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks about Lolcatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/#comment-1960</guid>
		<description>[...] - bookmarked by 2 members originally found by ignatia on 2008-12-10  Office of the Privacy Commissioner » Blog Archive » Lolcatz...  http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/ - bookmarked by 5 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; bookmarked by 2 members originally found by ignatia on 2008-12-10  Office of the Privacy Commissioner » Blog Archive » Lolcatz&#8230;  <a href="http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/</a> &#8211; bookmarked by 5 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Centre for Intellectual Property Policy &#187; The Net Waterloo or Water Law?</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1831</link>
		<dc:creator>Centre for Intellectual Property Policy &#187; The Net Waterloo or Water Law?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/#comment-1831</guid>
		<description>[...] traffic shaping. Because the operation of the software itself raises a series of privacy issues the Privacy Commissioner announced recently that it is currently looking into a complaint about deep packet [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] traffic shaping. Because the operation of the software itself raises a series of privacy issues the Privacy Commissioner announced recently that it is currently looking into a complaint about deep packet [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1191</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/#comment-1191</guid>
		<description>Great to see some coverage on net neutrality. If you&#039;ve not yet done so, subscribe to the CBC&#039;s podcast called &quot;Search Engine&quot;. Very good discussion on this and other techno-privacy related issues.

And speaking of net neutrality, who do we talk to about investigating whether or not the big telcos are seriously moving toward Internet packages along the lines of current TV/Satellite packages? &lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/tech_news/ISP_s_confirm_End_of_The_Internet_by_2012&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;See the Digg here for some discussion on this&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great to see some coverage on net neutrality. If you&#8217;ve not yet done so, subscribe to the CBC&#8217;s podcast called &#8220;Search Engine&#8221;. Very good discussion on this and other techno-privacy related issues.</p>
<p>And speaking of net neutrality, who do we talk to about investigating whether or not the big telcos are seriously moving toward Internet packages along the lines of current TV/Satellite packages? <a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/ISP_s_confirm_End_of_The_Internet_by_2012" rel="nofollow">See the Digg here for some discussion on this</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Gallant</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1182</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Gallant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 22:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/#comment-1182</guid>
		<description>I had no idea that government offices were writing blogs. Kudos for posting this, it&#039;s nice to know that there are human beings in the govm&#039;t sometimes :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea that government offices were writing blogs. Kudos for posting this, it&#8217;s nice to know that there are human beings in the govm&#8217;t sometimes <img src='http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Fergusson</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/comment-page-1/#comment-1166</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Fergusson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 04:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2008/06/03/lolcatz-support-net-neutrality/#comment-1166</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not surprised that the Office of the Privacy Commissioner is aware of the fight for net neutrality, and I&#039;m also not surprised that the Office is up on the latest internet trends; but I&#039;m thoroughly amused and impressed the Office is up to lolcatz. srsly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not surprised that the Office of the Privacy Commissioner is aware of the fight for net neutrality, and I&#8217;m also not surprised that the Office is up on the latest internet trends; but I&#8217;m thoroughly amused and impressed the Office is up to lolcatz. srsly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
