<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Fess up &#8211; where does my data go?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2011/02/09/fess-up-where-does-my-data-go/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2011/02/09/fess-up-where-does-my-data-go/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 15:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daphne Guerrero</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2011/02/09/fess-up-where-does-my-data-go/comment-page-1/#comment-37692</link>
		<dc:creator>Daphne Guerrero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/?p=1079#comment-37692</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s certainly possible that the developer just hadn&#039;t thought to include information on collection and disclosure as you point out, Bowen.
And Jeff, you rightly point out there may be a legitimate reason for collection. We would definitely welcome clarity from the developer.
Independent app developers sometimes don&#039;t pay due attention to privacy (something we talked about &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2010/04/26/incorporating-privacy-into-design-a-friendly-message-to-the-open-data-community/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;) and that&#039;s something our Office would like to address in our outreach and awareness-raising initiatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s certainly possible that the developer just hadn&#8217;t thought to include information on collection and disclosure as you point out, Bowen.<br />
And Jeff, you rightly point out there may be a legitimate reason for collection. We would definitely welcome clarity from the developer.<br />
Independent app developers sometimes don&#8217;t pay due attention to privacy (something we talked about <a href="http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2010/04/26/incorporating-privacy-into-design-a-friendly-message-to-the-open-data-community/" rel="nofollow">here</a>) and that&#8217;s something our Office would like to address in our outreach and awareness-raising initiatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Stevens</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2011/02/09/fess-up-where-does-my-data-go/comment-page-1/#comment-37691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 21:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/?p=1079#comment-37691</guid>
		<description>The information gathered customizes the examination of conscience.  Different questions are asked based on whether the user is married or single, a priest or not, a woman or man, old or young.  Because different people in different states of life are prone to different sins.  So there MAY be a legitimate reason for the data gathering.

It would be useful to know that this data is not transmitted.  Why not ask the developers?  They&#039;ve been responsive to other comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The information gathered customizes the examination of conscience.  Different questions are asked based on whether the user is married or single, a priest or not, a woman or man, old or young.  Because different people in different states of life are prone to different sins.  So there MAY be a legitimate reason for the data gathering.</p>
<p>It would be useful to know that this data is not transmitted.  Why not ask the developers?  They&#8217;ve been responsive to other comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Office of the Privacy Commissioner » Blog Archive » ‘Fess up – where does my data go? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2011/02/09/fess-up-where-does-my-data-go/comment-page-1/#comment-37683</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Office of the Privacy Commissioner » Blog Archive » ‘Fess up – where does my data go? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/?p=1079#comment-37683</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Privacy Commission , Colin McKay, BxMx, Privacy Matters, Privacy Matters and others. Privacy Matters said: RT @PrivacyPrivee: Fess up - where does my data go? The Confession app, and what&#039;s missing from it: http://is.gd/IgB2Rb [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Privacy Commission , Colin McKay, BxMx, Privacy Matters, Privacy Matters and others. Privacy Matters said: RT @PrivacyPrivee: Fess up &#8211; where does my data go? The Confession app, and what&#039;s missing from it: <a href="http://is.gd/IgB2Rb" rel="nofollow">http://is.gd/IgB2Rb</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bowen</title>
		<link>http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/index.php/2011/02/09/fess-up-where-does-my-data-go/comment-page-1/#comment-37680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bowen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 20:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.privcom.gc.ca/?p=1079#comment-37680</guid>
		<description>I agree - that&#039;s one of the pieces that I was wondering about when I retweeted the app yesterday. 

I wonder if the information on where that information goes is missing because the developer simply didn&#039;t think about it, because the Church isn&#039;t a business in the traditional sense? Or if it&#039;s about gathering a larger profile for better marketing..... which is a bit like Pharisees in front of the Temple all over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; that&#8217;s one of the pieces that I was wondering about when I retweeted the app yesterday. </p>
<p>I wonder if the information on where that information goes is missing because the developer simply didn&#8217;t think about it, because the Church isn&#8217;t a business in the traditional sense? Or if it&#8217;s about gathering a larger profile for better marketing&#8230;.. which is a bit like Pharisees in front of the Temple all over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

